Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERITER HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERITER HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 520089 | WI | 332 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.4M → Pro Forma $-23.3M (+$27.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$513.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$27.0M
Modeled Uplift
$18.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.5M (vs $27.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$329K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.3M$10.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.9M$283K$10.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$19.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$329K$329K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$164K$329K$329K$329K$329K$329K$329K
Cumulative$0$7.4M$14.7M$21.9M$27.0M$27.0M$27.0M$27.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.4M$-50.4M-9.8%
Year 1$-51.9M+$18.0M$-33.9M-6.6%
Year 2$-53.4M+$27.0M$-26.4M-5.1%
Year 3$-55.0M+$27.0M$-28.0M-5.5%
Year 4$-56.7M+$27.0M$-29.7M-5.8%
Year 5$-58.4M+$27.0M$-31.4M-6.1%
$-503.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-345.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$158.8M
Value Created
$-31.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-80.2M
Organic Growth
$270.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-31.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$12.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$12.2M
A/R Days Reduction$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$164K$247K$329K$395K
Total$13.5M$20.3M$27.0M$32.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.8%-11.9%1.4%4.7%
P32
Net-to-Gross30.8%29.4%33.9%38.2%
P35
Occupancy63.1%49.3%62.5%71.1%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.5M$2.7M
P48
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.9M$2.8M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML