Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL
CCN 520075 | WI | 237 beds | Current EBITDA $12.0M → Pro Forma $46.2M (+$34.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$649.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$46.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$34.2M
Modeled Uplift
$23.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.8M (vs $34.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$416K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.0M$13.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.5M$357K$12.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$5.9M$7.9M$24.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$416K$416K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.2M$6.5M$9.7M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$208K$416K$416K$416K$416K$416K$416K
Cumulative$0$9.3M$18.6M$27.7M$34.2M$34.2M$34.2M$34.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.0x96% / 29.3x101% / 32.5x103% / 34.1x104% / 35.8x
9.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.6x95% / 28.5x97% / 30.0x99% / 31.4x
10.0x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.0x
11.0x78% / 18.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 22.8x89% / 23.9x91% / 25.1x
12.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.0M$12.0M1.9%
Year 1$12.4M+$22.8M$35.2M5.4%
Year 2$12.7M+$34.2M$46.9M7.2%
Year 3$13.1M+$34.2M$47.3M7.3%
Year 4$13.5M+$34.2M$47.7M7.3%
Year 5$13.9M+$34.2M$48.1M7.4%
$120.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$529.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$408.8M
Value Created
$48.1M
Exit EBITDA
$19.1M
Organic Growth
$341.6M
RCM Value Creation
$48.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.5M$9.7M$13.0M$15.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.4M$9.6M$12.9M$15.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
Clean Claim Rate$208K$312K$416K$499K
Total$17.1M$25.6M$34.2M$41.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-12.7%0.9%6.1%
P52
Net-to-Gross34.1%28.0%33.5%38.6%
P54
Occupancy59.5%47.7%60.5%65.9%
P41
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.1M$1.5M$2.4M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.3M$1.7M$2.5M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML