Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MED CTR OF MANITOWOC COUNTY 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MED CTR OF MANITOWOC COUNTY
CCN 520034 | WI | 69 beds | Current EBITDA $21.5M → Pro Forma $26.6M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$96.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$21.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$26.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$295K$875K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$481K$962K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$476K$952K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$390K$780K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$21.5M$21.5M22.4%
Year 1$22.2M+$3.4M$25.5M26.5%
Year 2$22.8M+$5.1M$27.9M29.0%
Year 3$23.5M+$5.1M$28.6M29.7%
Year 4$24.2M+$5.1M$29.3M30.4%
Year 5$24.9M+$5.1M$30.0M31.2%
$215.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$330.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$114.9M
Value Created
$30.0M
Exit EBITDA
$34.3M
Organic Growth
$50.6M
RCM Value Creation
$30.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$962K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$952K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$585K$878K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$46K$62K$74K
Total$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.4%-16.2%-4.8%12.8%
P85
Net-to-Gross31.2%28.4%33.1%38.5%
P38
Occupancy29.6%33.1%51.3%62.1%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.4M$622K$1.8M$2.4M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.1M$782K$1.7M$2.5M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML