Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS
CCN 520033 | WI | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $21.1M → Pro Forma $29.6M (+$8.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$161.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$21.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$8.5M
Modeled Uplift
$6.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.5M (vs $8.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$103K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.2M$3.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$89K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$495K$1.5M$2.0M$6.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$103K$103K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$806K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$798K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$654K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$52K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$21.1M$21.1M13.1%
Year 1$21.7M+$5.7M$27.4M17.0%
Year 2$22.4M+$8.5M$30.8M19.1%
Year 3$23.0M+$8.5M$31.5M19.5%
Year 4$23.7M+$8.5M$32.2M20.0%
Year 5$24.4M+$8.5M$32.9M20.4%
$210.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$362.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$151.3M
Value Created
$32.9M
Exit EBITDA
$33.6M
Organic Growth
$84.8M
RCM Value Creation
$32.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$981K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$52K$77K$103K$124K
Total$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-8.1%1.2%8.6%
P82
Net-to-Gross36.5%33.5%42.7%51.2%
P30
Occupancy81.0%28.1%39.8%51.5%
P94
Rev/Bed$3.7M$985K$2.0M$3.0M
P89
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.1M$1.8M$2.9M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML