Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MILDRED MITCHELL-BATEMAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MILDRED MITCHELL-BATEMAN HOSPITAL
CCN 514009 | WV | 110 beds | Current EBITDA $268K → Pro Forma $458K (+$190K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$268K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$190K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$458K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+568bps
Margin Improvement
$128K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$190K
Modeled Uplift
$142K
Risk-Adjusted
-$48K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$73K
+217bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$67K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$41K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+29bp
Total EBITDA Impact$190K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$64K$8K$73K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$67K$67K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$10K$30K$41K$128K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$18K$36K$55K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cost to Collect$0$17K$33K$50K$67K$67K$67K$67K
A/R Days Reduction$0$14K$27K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$53K$107K$155K$190K$190K$190K$190K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $190K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$268K$268K8.0%
Year 1$276K+$127K$402K12.0%
Year 2$284K+$190K$474K14.2%
Year 3$293K+$190K$483K14.4%
Year 4$301K+$190K$491K14.7%
Year 5$310K+$190K$500K14.9%
$2.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.8M
Value Created
$500K
Exit EBITDA
$427K
Organic Growth
$1.9M
RCM Value Creation
$500K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$36K$55K$73K$87K
Cost to Collect$33K$50K$67K$80K
A/R Days Reduction$20K$31K$41K$49K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$95K$142K$190K$228K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-7.7%3.6%12.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross10.5%25.8%33.5%41.5%
P0
Occupancy93.1%51.3%65.3%83.7%
P95
Rev/Bed$30K$421K$922K$1.4M
P0
Exp/Bed$516K$415K$837K$1.3M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML