Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND HOSPITAL
CCN 514001 | WV | 115 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $5.6M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$547K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$637K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$631K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$388K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$637K$637K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$613K$18K$631K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$98K$290K$388K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$159K$319K$478K$637K$637K$637K$637K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$158K$315K$473K$631K$631K$631K$631K
A/R Days Reduction$0$129K$258K$388K$388K$388K$388K$388K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$456K$913K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M12.2%
Year 1$4.0M+$1.1M$5.1M16.1%
Year 2$4.1M+$1.7M$5.8M18.2%
Year 3$4.2M+$1.7M$5.9M18.6%
Year 4$4.4M+$1.7M$6.1M19.0%
Year 5$4.5M+$1.7M$6.2M19.4%
$38.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$68.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.1M
Value Created
$6.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.2M
Organic Growth
$16.8M
RCM Value Creation
$6.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$319K$478K$637K$765K
Denial Rate Reductio$315K$473K$631K$757K
A/R Days Reduction$194K$291K$388K$465K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$838K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-7.7%3.6%12.6%
P67
Net-to-Gross49.5%25.8%33.5%41.5%
P78
Occupancy62.9%51.3%65.3%83.7%
P42
Rev/Bed$277K$421K$922K$1.4M
P17
Exp/Bed$243K$415K$837K$1.3M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML