Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 513030 | WV | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $7.3M → Pro Forma $9.8M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$673K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$940K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$931K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$572K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$940K$940K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$905K$26K$931K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$144K$428K$572K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$235K$470K$705K$940K$940K$940K$940K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$233K$465K$698K$931K$931K$931K$931K
A/R Days Reduction$0$191K$381K$572K$572K$572K$572K$572K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$673K$1.3M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.3M$7.3M15.6%
Year 1$7.6M+$1.6M$9.2M19.6%
Year 2$7.8M+$2.5M$10.3M21.8%
Year 3$8.0M+$2.5M$10.5M22.3%
Year 4$8.3M+$2.5M$10.7M22.9%
Year 5$8.5M+$2.5M$11.0M23.4%
$73.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$120.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.4M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$11.7M
Organic Growth
$24.7M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$470K$705K$940K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$465K$698K$931K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$286K$429K$572K$686K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-8.5%1.3%12.2%
P81
Net-to-Gross67.2%26.7%33.1%42.8%
P86
Occupancy82.6%44.8%60.7%82.6%
P73
Rev/Bed$490K$477K$814K$1.3M
P29
Exp/Bed$413K$440K$799K$1.3M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML