Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 513027 | WV | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $5.9M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$868K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$898K
Risk-Adjusted
-$292K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$452K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$448K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$275K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$452K$452K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$435K$12K$448K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$206K$275K$868K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$113K$226K$339K$452K$452K$452K$452K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$448K$448K$448K$448K
A/R Days Reduction$0$92K$184K$275K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$324K$648K$965K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.6x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M20.6%
Year 1$4.8M+$793K$5.6M24.7%
Year 2$4.9M+$1.2M$6.1M27.1%
Year 3$5.1M+$1.2M$6.3M27.8%
Year 4$5.2M+$1.2M$6.4M28.5%
Year 5$5.4M+$1.2M$6.6M29.1%
$46.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$72.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.9M
Value Created
$6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$7.4M
Organic Growth
$11.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$226K$339K$452K$543K
Denial Rate Reductio$224K$336K$448K$537K
A/R Days Reduction$138K$206K$275K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$595K$893K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.6%-12.5%1.3%10.7%
P86
Net-to-Gross70.4%28.0%43.4%56.3%
P89
Occupancy91.4%25.3%39.2%64.0%
P97
Rev/Bed$552K$557K$950K$1.7M
P23
Exp/Bed$438K$535K$980K$1.5M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML