Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 06:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 513026 | WV | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $5.7M → Pro Forma $6.9M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$915K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$875K
Risk-Adjusted
-$380K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$477K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$472K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$290K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$477K$477K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$459K$13K$472K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$217K$290K$915K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$119K$239K$358K$477K$477K$477K$477K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$118K$236K$354K$472K$472K$472K$472K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$194K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$342K$684K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.7M$5.7M23.8%
Year 1$5.9M+$837K$6.7M28.0%
Year 2$6.0M+$1.3M$7.3M30.5%
Year 3$6.2M+$1.3M$7.5M31.3%
Year 4$6.4M+$1.3M$7.7M32.1%
Year 5$6.6M+$1.3M$7.8M32.9%
$56.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$86.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.4M
Value Created
$7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$9.1M
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$239K$358K$477K$573K
Denial Rate Reductio$236K$354K$472K$567K
A/R Days Reduction$145K$218K$290K$348K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$628K$941K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.8%-10.8%6.2%13.5%
P90
Net-to-Gross73.0%23.6%31.5%47.2%
P95
Occupancy65.3%40.5%65.3%84.9%
P48
Rev/Bed$398K$458K$544K$937K
P15
Exp/Bed$303K$416K$513K$1.0M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML