Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH WEIRTON 2026-04-26 04:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH WEIRTON
CCN 512005 | WV | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $358K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$358K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$352K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$552K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$547K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$336K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$552K$552K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$532K$15K$547K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$251K$336K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$138K$276K$414K$552K$552K$552K$552K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$137K$273K$410K$547K$547K$547K$547K
A/R Days Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$336K$336K$336K$336K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$396K$791K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x103% / 34.9x108% / 39.1x113% / 43.3x115% / 45.5x117% / 47.6x
9.0x98% / 30.6x103% / 34.4x107% / 38.2x109% / 40.0x111% / 41.9x
10.0x94% / 27.2x98% / 30.6x102% / 34.0x104% / 35.7x106% / 37.4x
11.0x90% / 24.5x94% / 27.6x98% / 30.6x100% / 32.2x102% / 33.7x
12.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.0x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
74%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 74% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$358K$358K1.3%
Year 1$369K+$969K$1.3M4.8%
Year 2$380K+$1.5M$1.8M6.6%
Year 3$392K+$1.5M$1.8M6.7%
Year 4$403K+$1.5M$1.9M6.7%
Year 5$416K+$1.5M$1.9M6.8%
$3.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$20.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.0M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$571K
Organic Growth
$14.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$276K$414K$552K$663K
Denial Rate Reductio$273K$410K$547K$656K
A/R Days Reduction$168K$252K$336K$403K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$726K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-13.1%1.3%10.4%
P46
Net-to-Gross17.9%28.9%42.8%55.8%
P5
Occupancy87.4%28.2%40.5%64.1%
P89
Rev/Bed$564K$552K$950K$1.5M
P30
Exp/Bed$556K$513K$1.0M$1.3M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML