Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH MORGANTOWN 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH MORGANTOWN
CCN 512004 | WV | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$871K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$871K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$635K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$871K
Modeled Uplift
$611K
Risk-Adjusted
-$260K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$331K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$328K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$201K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$871K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$331K$331K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$319K$9K$328K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$151K$201K$635K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$83K$165K$248K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$164K$246K$328K$328K$328K$328K
A/R Days Reduction$0$67K$134K$201K$201K$201K$201K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$237K$474K$706K$871K$871K$871K$871K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $871K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M10.4%
Year 1$1.8M+$580K$2.3M14.2%
Year 2$1.8M+$871K$2.7M16.3%
Year 3$1.9M+$871K$2.7M16.6%
Year 4$1.9M+$871K$2.8M16.9%
Year 5$2.0M+$871K$2.9M17.3%
$17.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.3M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.7M
Organic Growth
$8.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$165K$248K$331K$397K
Denial Rate Reductio$164K$246K$328K$393K
A/R Days Reduction$101K$151K$201K$242K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$435K$653K$871K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.4%-12.0%4.3%11.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross17.9%28.9%43.6%56.8%
P9
Occupancy64.1%28.2%39.2%63.8%
P76
Rev/Bed$487K$561K$950K$1.8M
P12
Exp/Bed$436K$556K$980K$1.3M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML