Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CHARLESTON 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CHARLESTON
CCN 512002 | WV | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$945K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$945K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$689K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$945K
Modeled Uplift
$679K
Risk-Adjusted
-$266K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$359K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$356K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$219K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$945K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$359K$359K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$346K$10K$356K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$163K$219K$689K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$180K$269K$359K$359K$359K$359K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$356K$356K$356K$356K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$257K$515K$766K$945K$945K$945K$945K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $945K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x
10.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M9.0%
Year 1$1.7M+$630K$2.3M12.8%
Year 2$1.7M+$945K$2.7M14.8%
Year 3$1.8M+$945K$2.7M15.1%
Year 4$1.8M+$945K$2.8M15.4%
Year 5$1.9M+$945K$2.8M15.7%
$16.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.8M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$2.6M
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$180K$269K$359K$431K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$267K$356K$427K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$164K$219K$262K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$472K$709K$945K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.0%-12.3%2.8%10.6%
P59
Net-to-Gross17.1%28.5%43.5%56.1%
P3
Occupancy69.9%26.7%38.0%59.8%
P84
Rev/Bed$561K$563K$995K$1.9M
P22
Exp/Bed$511K$681K$998K$1.4M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML