Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MED CENTER 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MED CENTER
CCN 511322 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $183K → Pro Forma $3.4M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$183K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$809K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$738K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$186K$552K$738K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$303K$606K$910K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$300K$600K$901K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$246K$492K$738K$738K$738K$738K$738K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$869K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x166% / 132.6x172% / 147.6x177% / 162.7x179% / 170.3x182% / 177.8x
9.0x159% / 117.5x165% / 130.9x170% / 144.3x173% / 151.0x175% / 157.7x
10.0x154% / 105.4x159% / 117.5x165% / 129.5x167% / 135.6x169% / 141.6x
11.0x149% / 95.5x154% / 106.5x159% / 117.5x162% / 123.0x164% / 128.4x
12.0x144% / 87.3x150% / 97.3x155% / 107.4x157% / 112.4x159% / 117.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.0x
Headroom (turns)
93%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 93% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.5x, adding 8.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$183K$183K0.3%
Year 1$189K+$2.1M$2.3M3.8%
Year 2$194K+$3.2M$3.4M5.6%
Year 3$200K+$3.2M$3.4M5.6%
Year 4$206K+$3.2M$3.4M5.6%
Year 5$212K+$3.2M$3.4M5.6%
$1.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.6M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$292K
Organic Growth
$31.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$606K$910K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$600K$901K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$369K$553K$738K$886K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P45
Net-to-Gross37.0%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P35
Occupancy76.5%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P87
Rev/Bed$2.4M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.4M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML