Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL OF BUCKHANNON 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL OF BUCKHANNON
CCN 511321 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $16.0M → Pro Forma $21.3M (+$5.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$101.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$5.3M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$65K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$56K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$311K$923K$1.2M$3.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$65K$65K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$507K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$502K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$411K$823K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$32K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.0M$16.0M15.7%
Year 1$16.4M+$3.6M$20.0M19.7%
Year 2$16.9M+$5.3M$22.3M21.9%
Year 3$17.4M+$5.3M$22.8M22.4%
Year 4$18.0M+$5.3M$23.3M23.0%
Year 5$18.5M+$5.3M$23.8M23.5%
$159.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$262.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$102.6M
Value Created
$23.8M
Exit EBITDA
$25.4M
Organic Growth
$53.4M
RCM Value Creation
$23.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$617K$926K$1.2M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$32K$49K$65K$78K
Total$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.7%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P84
Net-to-Gross45.3%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P52
Occupancy47.1%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P61
Rev/Bed$4.1M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P97
Exp/Bed$3.4M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML