Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 511320 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $6.0M → Pro Forma $8.6M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$803K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$958K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$948K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$583K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$958K$958K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$922K$26K$948K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$436K$583K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$239K$479K$718K$958K$958K$958K$958K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$237K$474K$711K$948K$948K$948K$948K
A/R Days Reduction$0$194K$388K$583K$583K$583K$583K$583K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$686K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.0M$6.0M12.6%
Year 1$6.2M+$1.7M$7.9M16.5%
Year 2$6.4M+$2.5M$8.9M18.6%
Year 3$6.6M+$2.5M$9.1M19.0%
Year 4$6.8M+$2.5M$9.3M19.5%
Year 5$7.0M+$2.5M$9.5M19.9%
$60.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$104.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.3M
Value Created
$9.5M
Exit EBITDA
$9.6M
Organic Growth
$25.2M
RCM Value Creation
$9.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$479K$718K$958K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$474K$711K$948K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$291K$437K$583K$699K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P81
Net-to-Gross39.3%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P42
Occupancy46.7%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P58
Rev/Bed$1.9M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P74
Exp/Bed$1.7M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML