Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 511319 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $8.3M → Pro Forma $12.8M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$85.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$262K$778K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$427K$855K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$423K$846K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$347K$693K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.3x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.3M$8.3M9.7%
Year 1$8.5M+$3.0M$11.5M13.5%
Year 2$8.8M+$4.5M$13.3M15.6%
Year 3$9.1M+$4.5M$13.6M15.9%
Year 4$9.3M+$4.5M$13.8M16.2%
Year 5$9.6M+$4.5M$14.1M16.5%
$83.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$155.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$72.3M
Value Created
$14.1M
Exit EBITDA
$13.2M
Organic Growth
$45.0M
RCM Value Creation
$14.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$855K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$846K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$520K$780K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$55K$66K
Total$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.7%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross49.9%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P65
Occupancy57.5%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P74
Rev/Bed$3.4M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.1M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML