Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PLATEAU MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PLATEAU MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 511317 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $19.1M → Pro Forma $21.5M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$19.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$809K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$922K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$913K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$561K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$922K$922K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$887K$25K$913K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$141K$420K$561K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$231K$461K$692K$922K$922K$922K$922K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$228K$456K$685K$913K$913K$913K$913K
A/R Days Reduction$0$187K$374K$561K$561K$561K$561K$561K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$660K$1.3M$2.0M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$19.1M$19.1M41.4%
Year 1$19.6M+$1.6M$21.3M46.1%
Year 2$20.2M+$2.4M$22.7M49.2%
Year 3$20.8M+$2.4M$23.3M50.5%
Year 4$21.5M+$2.4M$23.9M51.8%
Year 5$22.1M+$2.4M$24.5M53.2%
$190.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$269.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.2M
Value Created
$24.5M
Exit EBITDA
$30.4M
Organic Growth
$24.3M
RCM Value Creation
$24.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$461K$692K$922K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$456K$685K$913K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$280K$421K$561K$673K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin41.4%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P97
Net-to-Gross27.2%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P23
Occupancy39.2%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P52
Rev/Bed$1.8M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.1M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML