Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — POCAHONTAS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — POCAHONTAS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 511314 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $-46K (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-46K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$793K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$632K
Risk-Adjusted
-$456K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$414K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$410K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$252K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$414K$414K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$398K$11K$410K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$63K$188K$252K$793K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$103K$207K$310K$414K$414K$414K$414K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$102K$205K$307K$410K$410K$410K$410K
A/R Days Reduction$0$84K$168K$252K$252K$252K$252K$252K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$296K$593K$882K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-5.5%
Year 1$-1.2M+$725K$-443K-2.1%
Year 2$-1.2M+$1.1M$-115K-0.6%
Year 3$-1.2M+$1.1M$-151K-0.7%
Year 4$-1.3M+$1.1M$-189K-0.9%
Year 5$-1.3M+$1.1M$-227K-1.1%
$-11.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$-227K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$10.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-227K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$207K$310K$414K$496K
Denial Rate Reductio$205K$307K$410K$491K
A/R Days Reduction$126K$189K$252K$302K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$544K$816K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.5%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P35
Net-to-Gross68.7%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P90
Occupancy10.6%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$827K$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P39
Exp/Bed$873K$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML