Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUMMERS COUNTY ARH 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUMMERS COUNTY ARH
CCN 511310 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.0M → Pro Forma $-3.0M (+$962K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$962K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$701K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$962K
Modeled Uplift
$600K
Risk-Adjusted
-$361K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$366K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$362K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$222K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$962K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$366K$366K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$352K$10K$362K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$166K$222K$701K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$183K$274K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$181K$271K$362K$362K$362K$362K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$262K$524K$780K$962K$962K$962K$962K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $962K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.0M$-4.0M-21.9%
Year 1$-4.1M+$641K$-3.5M-19.1%
Year 2$-4.3M+$962K$-3.3M-18.0%
Year 3$-4.4M+$962K$-3.4M-18.7%
Year 4$-4.5M+$962K$-3.6M-19.4%
Year 5$-4.6M+$962K$-3.7M-20.2%
$-40.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-40.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-458K
Value Created
$-3.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.4M
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$183K$274K$366K$439K
Denial Rate Reductio$181K$271K$362K$434K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$167K$222K$267K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$481K$721K$962K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.9%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P13
Net-to-Gross33.2%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P32
Occupancy28.9%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P29
Rev/Bed$731K$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P32
Exp/Bed$892K$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML