Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRAXTON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRAXTON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 511308 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$842K
Risk-Adjusted
-$564K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$534K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$529K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$325K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$534K$534K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$514K$15K$529K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$243K$325K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$134K$267K$401K$534K$534K$534K$534K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$132K$265K$397K$529K$529K$529K$529K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$217K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$383K$766K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M10.2%
Year 1$2.8M+$937K$3.8M14.1%
Year 2$2.9M+$1.4M$4.3M16.1%
Year 3$3.0M+$1.4M$4.4M16.5%
Year 4$3.1M+$1.4M$4.5M16.8%
Year 5$3.2M+$1.4M$4.6M17.1%
$27.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$50.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.0M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$14.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$267K$401K$534K$641K
Denial Rate Reductio$265K$397K$529K$635K
A/R Days Reduction$163K$244K$325K$390K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$703K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P71
Net-to-Gross56.8%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P77
Occupancy18.0%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.1M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P48
Exp/Bed$959K$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML