Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WETZEL COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WETZEL COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 510072 | WV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$630K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$674K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$667K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$410K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$674K$674K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$648K$19K$667K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$103K$306K$410K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$168K$337K$505K$674K$674K$674K$674K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$167K$333K$500K$667K$667K$667K$667K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$273K$410K$410K$410K$410K$410K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$483K$965K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
9.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M9.4%
Year 1$3.2M+$1.2M$4.4M13.1%
Year 2$3.3M+$1.8M$5.1M15.2%
Year 3$3.4M+$1.8M$5.2M15.5%
Year 4$3.5M+$1.8M$5.3M15.8%
Year 5$3.7M+$1.8M$5.4M16.1%
$31.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$59.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$28.2M
Value Created
$5.4M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$337K$505K$674K$808K
Denial Rate Reductio$333K$500K$667K$800K
A/R Days Reduction$205K$307K$410K$492K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$886K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.4%-12.5%1.3%10.3%
P65
Net-to-Gross28.9%28.0%43.6%53.7%
P26
Occupancy34.2%25.3%36.7%56.8%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.3M$579K$1.1M$1.9M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.2M$735K$1.0M$1.8M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML