Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THOMAS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THOMAS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 510029 | WV | 176 beds | Current EBITDA $55.8M → Pro Forma $66.8M (+$11.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$209.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$55.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$66.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$11.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.4M (vs $11.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$134K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.0M$115K$4.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$641K$1.9M$2.5M$8.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$134K$134K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$848K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$8.9M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x27% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$55.8M$55.8M26.7%
Year 1$57.5M+$7.3M$64.8M31.0%
Year 2$59.2M+$11.0M$70.2M33.6%
Year 3$61.0M+$11.0M$72.0M34.4%
Year 4$62.8M+$11.0M$73.8M35.3%
Year 5$64.7M+$11.0M$75.7M36.2%
$558.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$832.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$274.5M
Value Created
$75.7M
Exit EBITDA
$88.9M
Organic Growth
$109.9M
RCM Value Creation
$75.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$100K$134K$160K
Total$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$13.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.7%-8.4%-2.3%9.4%
P94
Net-to-Gross26.7%24.8%30.7%35.0%
P28
Occupancy54.0%51.3%71.1%79.9%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.2M$652K$1.3M$1.8M
P44
Exp/Bed$870K$619K$1.3M$1.8M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML