Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REYNOLDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REYNOLDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 510013 | WV | 94 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $11.2M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$123.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$4.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.3M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$79K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$379K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$79K$79K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$618K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$612K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$501K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x
9.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x
10.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.6x
11.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.8x
12.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M3.8%
Year 1$4.8M+$4.3M$9.1M7.4%
Year 2$5.0M+$6.5M$11.5M9.3%
Year 3$5.1M+$6.5M$11.6M9.4%
Year 4$5.3M+$6.5M$11.8M9.5%
Year 5$5.4M+$6.5M$11.9M9.6%
$46.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$131.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.4M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$7.4M
Organic Growth
$65.0M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$752K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$59K$79K$95K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.8%-10.8%2.4%12.3%
P55
Net-to-Gross34.9%26.4%31.8%43.7%
P55
Occupancy43.9%43.9%58.5%82.6%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.3M$458K$801K$1.2M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.3M$416K$761K$1.3M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML