Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS MEDICAL CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 04:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS MEDICAL CENTER INC.
CCN 510007 | WV | 350 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.0M → Pro Forma $-23.3M (+$26.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$507.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$26.7M
Modeled Uplift
$18.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.9M (vs $26.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$325K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.2M$10.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.8M$279K$10.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.6M$6.2M$19.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$325K$325K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$162K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K
Cumulative$0$7.3M$14.6M$21.7M$26.7M$26.7M$26.7M$26.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.0M$-50.0M-9.8%
Year 1$-51.5M+$17.8M$-33.7M-6.6%
Year 2$-53.1M+$26.7M$-26.3M-5.2%
Year 3$-54.6M+$26.7M$-27.9M-5.5%
Year 4$-56.3M+$26.7M$-29.6M-5.8%
Year 5$-58.0M+$26.7M$-31.3M-6.2%
$-500.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-343.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$156.2M
Value Created
$-31.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-79.7M
Organic Growth
$267.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-31.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$12.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.0M$7.5M$10.1M$12.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$162K$244K$325K$390K
Total$13.4M$20.0M$26.7M$32.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.8%-8.8%-7.2%1.0%
P12
Net-to-Gross28.2%25.8%29.0%32.0%
P38
Occupancy76.4%60.9%71.7%75.7%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.4M$2.2M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.6M$814K$1.6M$2.1M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML