Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 503300 | WA | 350 beds | Current EBITDA $97.2M → Pro Forma $186.7M (+$89.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.70B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$97.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$89.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$186.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$65.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$89.6M
Modeled Uplift
$67.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$22.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $67.2M (vs $89.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$34.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$33.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$20.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.1M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$89.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$34.0M$34.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$32.8M$936K$33.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.2M$15.5M$20.7M$65.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$8.5M$17.0M$25.5M$34.0M$34.0M$34.0M$34.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$8.4M$16.9M$25.3M$33.7M$33.7M$33.7M$33.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$545K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Cumulative$0$24.4M$48.8M$72.6M$89.6M$89.6M$89.6M$89.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $89.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.3x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.0x
9.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
10.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
11.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
12.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.1x
Headroom (turns)
32%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 32% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.4x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$97.2M$97.2M5.7%
Year 1$100.1M+$59.7M$159.8M9.4%
Year 2$103.1M+$89.6M$192.6M11.3%
Year 3$106.2M+$89.6M$195.7M11.5%
Year 4$109.3M+$89.6M$198.9M11.7%
Year 5$112.6M+$89.6M$202.2M11.9%
$971.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.25B
Value Created
$202.2M
Exit EBITDA
$154.7M
Organic Growth
$895.6M
RCM Value Creation
$202.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$17.0M$25.5M$34.0M$40.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$16.9M$25.3M$33.7M$40.5M
A/R Days Reduction$10.4M$15.5M$20.7M$24.9M
Clean Claim Rate$545K$817K$1.1M$1.3M
Total$44.8M$67.2M$89.6M$107.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.7%-15.0%-11.3%-5.1%
P96
Net-to-Gross50.7%25.5%29.2%34.8%
P93
Occupancy78.3%73.4%77.3%92.0%
P56
Rev/Bed$4.9M$1.7M$2.4M$2.9M
P93
Exp/Bed$4.6M$2.0M$2.7M$3.1M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML