Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN SPECIALTY CARE 2026-04-26 06:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN SPECIALTY CARE
CCN 503026 | WA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $7.7M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$494K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$596K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$590K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$363K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$596K$596K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$574K$16K$590K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$271K$363K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$149K$298K$447K$596K$596K$596K$596K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$148K$295K$443K$590K$590K$590K$590K
A/R Days Reduction$0$121K$242K$363K$363K$363K$363K$363K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$427K$854K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.7M$7.7M25.7%
Year 1$7.9M+$1.0M$8.9M29.9%
Year 2$8.1M+$1.6M$9.7M32.5%
Year 3$8.4M+$1.6M$9.9M33.3%
Year 4$8.6M+$1.6M$10.2M34.2%
Year 5$8.9M+$1.6M$10.4M35.0%
$76.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$114.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.3M
Value Created
$10.4M
Exit EBITDA
$12.2M
Organic Growth
$15.7M
RCM Value Creation
$10.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$298K$447K$596K$716K
Denial Rate Reductio$295K$443K$590K$708K
A/R Days Reduction$181K$272K$363K$435K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$784K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.7%-17.4%-9.7%-1.8%
P96
Net-to-Gross53.2%23.7%28.1%37.1%
P96
Occupancy62.4%54.7%68.3%82.2%
P33
Rev/Bed$497K$477K$1.4M$2.2M
P25
Exp/Bed$369K$524K$1.5M$2.2M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML