Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PEACE ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 18:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PEACE ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 501340 | WA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $186K (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$186K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1000K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$843K
Risk-Adjusted
-$528K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$521K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$516K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$317K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$521K$521K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$502K$14K$516K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$237K$317K$1000K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$130K$261K$391K$521K$521K$521K$521K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$129K$258K$387K$516K$516K$516K$516K
A/R Days Reduction$0$106K$211K$317K$317K$317K$317K$317K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$373K$747K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-53.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
60.3x
Headroom (turns)
927%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 927% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -53.8x, adding 152.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-4.5%
Year 1$-1.2M+$914K$-306K-1.2%
Year 2$-1.3M+$1.4M$114K0.4%
Year 3$-1.3M+$1.4M$77K0.3%
Year 4$-1.3M+$1.4M$38K0.1%
Year 5$-1.4M+$1.4M$-2K-0.0%
$-11.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-25K
Exit EV (11x)
$11.8M
Value Created
$-2K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$13.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-2K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$261K$391K$521K$626K
Denial Rate Reductio$258K$387K$516K$619K
A/R Days Reduction$159K$238K$317K$381K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.5%-23.5%-6.2%-4.1%
P62
Net-to-Gross52.7%50.0%56.5%61.1%
P38
Occupancy6.8%26.0%33.3%44.3%
P8
Rev/Bed$2.6M$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P62
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.5M$2.3M$2.7M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML