Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KITTITAS VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KITTITAS VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 501333 | WA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$6.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$121.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$6.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.6M (vs $6.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$67K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$371K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$605K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$599K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$491K$981K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x85% / 21.8x90% / 24.6x94% / 27.4x96% / 28.8x98% / 30.2x
9.0x80% / 19.0x85% / 21.5x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.2x93% / 26.4x
10.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.0x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.5x
11.0x72% / 15.0x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.1x
12.0x68% / 13.4x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
60%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 60% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8M$2.8M2.3%
Year 1$2.9M+$4.2M$7.1M5.9%
Year 2$3.0M+$6.4M$9.3M7.7%
Year 3$3.1M+$6.4M$9.4M7.8%
Year 4$3.2M+$6.4M$9.5M7.9%
Year 5$3.3M+$6.4M$9.6M8.0%
$28.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$77.7M
Value Created
$9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.5M
Organic Growth
$63.6M
RCM Value Creation
$9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$58K$77K$93K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-15.7%-9.4%-4.1%
P88
Net-to-Gross56.3%37.5%50.4%61.1%
P58
Occupancy48.0%28.9%48.0%58.2%
P49
Rev/Bed$4.8M$1.1M$1.8M$3.2M
P91
Exp/Bed$4.7M$1.3M$2.0M$3.1M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML