Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.1M (vs $5.6M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $2.1M | $2.1M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $2.1M | $59K | $2.1M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $328K | $973K | $1.3M | $4.1M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $68K | $68K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 61.1% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $535K | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $529K | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $434K | $868K | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $34K | $68K | $68K | $68K | $68K | $68K | $68K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $1.5M | $3.1M | $4.6M | $5.6M | $5.6M | $5.6M | $5.6M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 123% / 55.5x | 128% / 62.1x | 133% / 68.6x | 135% / 71.8x | 137% / 75.1x |
| 9.0x | 118% / 49.0x | 123% / 54.8x | 127% / 60.6x | 129% / 63.5x | 131% / 66.4x |
| 10.0x | 113% / 43.8x | 118% / 49.0x | 122% / 54.2x | 124% / 56.8x | 126% / 59.4x |
| 11.0x | 109% / 39.5x | 113% / 44.2x | 118% / 49.0x | 120% / 51.4x | 122% / 53.7x |
| 12.0x | 105% / 35.9x | 109% / 40.3x | 114% / 44.6x | 116% / 46.8x | 118% / 49.0x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 83% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.1x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $818K | — | $818K | 0.8% |
| Year 1 | $843K | +$3.8M | $4.6M | 4.3% |
| Year 2 | $868K | +$5.6M | $6.5M | 6.1% |
| Year 3 | $894K | +$5.6M | $6.5M | 6.1% |
| Year 4 | $921K | +$5.6M | $6.5M | 6.1% |
| Year 5 | $948K | +$5.6M | $6.6M | 6.1% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.6M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.5M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $651K | $976K | $1.3M | $1.6M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $34K | $51K | $68K | $82K |
| Total | $2.8M | $4.2M | $5.6M | $6.8M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 0.8% | -15.7% | -9.4% | -4.1% | P83 |
| Net-to-Gross | 50.8% | 37.5% | 50.4% | 61.1% | P53 |
| Occupancy | 50.0% | 28.9% | 48.0% | 58.2% | P58 |
| Rev/Bed | $4.3M | $1.1M | $1.8M | $3.2M | P88 |
| Exp/Bed | $4.2M | $1.3M | $2.0M | $3.1M | P86 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.