Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARBOR HEALTH MORTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARBOR HEALTH MORTON HOSPITAL
CCN 501319 | WA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.5M → Pro Forma $-1.7M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$713K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$680K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$673K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$414K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$680K$680K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$654K$19K$673K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$309K$414K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$170K$340K$510K$680K$680K$680K$680K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$337K$505K$673K$673K$673K$673K
A/R Days Reduction$0$138K$276K$414K$414K$414K$414K$414K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$487K$974K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.5M$-3.5M-10.3%
Year 1$-3.6M+$1.2M$-2.4M-7.1%
Year 2$-3.7M+$1.8M$-1.9M-5.7%
Year 3$-3.8M+$1.8M$-2.0M-6.0%
Year 4$-3.9M+$1.8M$-2.2M-6.3%
Year 5$-4.1M+$1.8M$-2.3M-6.7%
$-35.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-25.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.0M
Value Created
$-2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.6M
Organic Growth
$17.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$340K$510K$680K$816K
Denial Rate Reductio$337K$505K$673K$808K
A/R Days Reduction$207K$310K$414K$496K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$894K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.3%-15.7%-9.4%-4.1%
P43
Net-to-Gross66.2%37.5%50.4%61.1%
P81
Occupancy19.0%28.9%48.0%58.2%
P5
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.8M$3.2M
P35
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$2.0M$3.1M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML