Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
CCN 500141 | WA | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.4M → Pro Forma $13.1M (+$14.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$274.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$14.4M
Modeled Uplift
$11.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.2M (vs $14.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$175K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$151K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$841K$2.5M$3.3M$10.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$175K$175K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$88K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.7M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.4x
Headroom (turns)
114%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 114% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.9x, adding 99.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.4M$-1.4M-0.5%
Year 1$-1.4M+$9.6M$8.2M3.0%
Year 2$-1.4M+$14.4M$13.0M4.7%
Year 3$-1.5M+$14.4M$12.9M4.7%
Year 4$-1.5M+$14.4M$12.9M4.7%
Year 5$-1.6M+$14.4M$12.8M4.7%
$-13.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$141.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$154.9M
Value Created
$12.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.2M
Organic Growth
$144.2M
RCM Value Creation
$12.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$88K$132K$175K$211K
Total$7.2M$10.8M$14.4M$17.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.5%-21.1%-10.4%-2.0%
P82
Net-to-Gross16.8%23.8%29.6%36.7%
P12
Occupancy94.5%57.1%71.2%84.2%
P91
Rev/Bed$2.3M$497K$1.4M$2.6M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.3M$542K$1.7M$2.8M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML