Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER
CCN 500138 | WA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-804.2M → Pro Forma $-742.6M (+$61.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.17B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-804.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$61.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-742.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$44.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

95%
Realization (A)
$61.6M
Modeled Uplift
$58.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 95% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $58.5M (vs $61.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$23.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$750K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$61.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$23.4M$23.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$22.6M$644K$23.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.6M$10.7M$14.3M$44.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$750K$750K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.9M$11.7M$17.6M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.4M$23.2M$23.2M$23.2M$23.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.8M$9.5M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$375K$750K$750K$750K$750K$750K$750K
Cumulative$0$16.8M$33.6M$50.0M$61.6M$61.6M$61.6M$61.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $61.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-804.2M$-804.2M-68.6%
Year 1$-828.3M+$41.1M$-787.2M-67.2%
Year 2$-853.2M+$61.6M$-791.5M-67.6%
Year 3$-878.8M+$61.6M$-817.1M-69.7%
Year 4$-905.1M+$61.6M$-843.5M-72.0%
Year 5$-932.3M+$61.6M$-870.7M-74.3%
$-8.04B
Entry EV (10x)
$-9.58B
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.54B
Value Created
$-870.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.28B
Organic Growth
$616.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-870.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.7M$17.6M$23.4M$28.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.6M$17.4M$23.2M$27.8M
A/R Days Reduction$7.1M$10.7M$14.3M$17.1M
Clean Claim Rate$375K$562K$750K$900K
Total$30.8M$46.2M$61.6M$74.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-13.5%-8.6%-3.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross50.0%45.1%52.7%64.8%
P37
Occupancy93.5%26.9%41.6%52.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$58.6M$1.1M$1.8M$3.5M
P98
Exp/Bed$98.8M$1.2M$2.0M$3.4M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML