Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500108 | WA | 337 beds | Current EBITDA $-84.1M → Pro Forma $-47.8M (+$36.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$690.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-84.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-47.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$36.3M
Modeled Uplift
$28.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.1M (vs $36.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$442K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.8M$13.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.3M$380K$13.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$442K$442K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.3M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$221K$442K$442K$442K$442K$442K$442K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.8M$29.5M$36.3M$36.3M$36.3M$36.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-84.1M$-84.1M-12.2%
Year 1$-86.6M+$24.2M$-62.4M-9.0%
Year 2$-89.2M+$36.3M$-52.9M-7.7%
Year 3$-91.9M+$36.3M$-55.6M-8.0%
Year 4$-94.7M+$36.3M$-58.3M-8.4%
Year 5$-97.5M+$36.3M$-61.2M-8.9%
$-841.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-672.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$168.2M
Value Created
$-61.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-134.0M
Organic Growth
$363.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-61.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$16.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.8M$10.3M$13.7M$16.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$221K$331K$442K$530K
Total$18.2M$27.2M$36.3M$43.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.2%-15.0%-11.3%-5.1%
P41
Net-to-Gross19.0%25.5%29.2%34.8%
P0
Occupancy104.5%73.4%77.3%92.0%
P96
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.7M$2.4M$2.9M
P37
Exp/Bed$2.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.1M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML