Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROV SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROV SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500054 | WA | 609 beds | Current EBITDA $-229.7M → Pro Forma $-180.0M (+$49.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$945.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-229.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$49.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-180.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$36.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$49.8M
Modeled Uplift
$34.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $34.1M (vs $49.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$605K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$49.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.9M$18.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$18.2M$520K$18.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.9M$8.6M$11.5M$36.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$605K$605K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.7M$9.5M$14.2M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.7M$9.4M$14.0M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$303K$605K$605K$605K$605K$605K$605K
Cumulative$0$13.5M$27.1M$40.3M$49.8M$49.8M$49.8M$49.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $49.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-229.7M$-229.7M-24.3%
Year 1$-236.6M+$33.2M$-203.4M-21.5%
Year 2$-243.7M+$49.8M$-194.0M-20.5%
Year 3$-251.0M+$49.8M$-201.3M-21.3%
Year 4$-258.6M+$49.8M$-208.8M-22.1%
Year 5$-266.3M+$49.8M$-216.6M-22.9%
$-2.30B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.38B
Exit EV (11x)
$-84.9M
Value Created
$-216.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-365.9M
Organic Growth
$497.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-216.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.5M$14.2M$18.9M$22.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.4M$14.0M$18.7M$22.5M
A/R Days Reduction$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$13.8M
Clean Claim Rate$303K$454K$605K$726K
Total$24.9M$37.3M$49.8M$59.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.3%-14.9%-12.2%-11.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross29.6%26.3%28.3%35.5%
P62
Occupancy78.2%75.6%87.9%95.6%
P31
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.7M$2.0M$3.0M
P15
Exp/Bed$1.9M$2.0M$2.3M$3.3M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML