Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500051 | WA | 296 beds | Current EBITDA $-97.6M → Pro Forma $-62.1M (+$35.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$675.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-97.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-62.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$35.5M
Modeled Uplift
$24.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.7M (vs $35.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$432K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.5M$13.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.0M$371K$13.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.1M$8.2M$25.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$432K$432K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.1M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$216K$432K$432K$432K$432K$432K$432K
Cumulative$0$9.7M$19.3M$28.8M$35.5M$35.5M$35.5M$35.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-97.6M$-97.6M-14.5%
Year 1$-100.5M+$23.7M$-76.9M-11.4%
Year 2$-103.6M+$35.5M$-68.0M-10.1%
Year 3$-106.7M+$35.5M$-71.2M-10.5%
Year 4$-109.9M+$35.5M$-74.4M-11.0%
Year 5$-113.2M+$35.5M$-77.6M-11.5%
$-976.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-854.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$122.0M
Value Created
$-77.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-155.5M
Organic Growth
$355.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-77.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.8M$10.1M$13.5M$16.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
Clean Claim Rate$216K$324K$432K$518K
Total$17.8M$26.6M$35.5M$42.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.5%-14.4%-11.0%-5.1%
P23
Net-to-Gross29.0%25.3%29.4%35.1%
P42
Occupancy63.7%73.3%77.1%92.3%
P12
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.8M$2.5M$2.9M
P42
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.9M$2.7M$3.2M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML