Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — YAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — YAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 500036 | WA | 208 beds | Current EBITDA $-54.2M → Pro Forma $-26.8M (+$27.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$522.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-54.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-26.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$27.5M
Modeled Uplift
$19.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.8M (vs $27.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$334K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.4M$10.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.1M$287K$10.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$334K$334K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$167K$334K$334K$334K$334K$334K$334K
Cumulative$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.3M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-54.2M$-54.2M-10.4%
Year 1$-55.9M+$18.3M$-37.5M-7.2%
Year 2$-57.5M+$27.5M$-30.1M-5.8%
Year 3$-59.3M+$27.5M$-31.8M-6.1%
Year 4$-61.0M+$27.5M$-33.6M-6.4%
Year 5$-62.9M+$27.5M$-35.4M-6.8%
$-542.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-389.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$153.0M
Value Created
$-35.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-86.4M
Organic Growth
$274.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-35.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.8M$10.3M$12.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$167K$251K$334K$401K
Total$13.7M$20.6M$27.5M$33.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.4%-14.9%-10.4%-1.5%
P46
Net-to-Gross30.0%23.0%27.5%31.2%
P62
Occupancy70.5%63.7%75.6%89.1%
P27
Rev/Bed$2.5M$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M
P62
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML