Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500027 | WA | 603 beds | Current EBITDA $-208.6M → Pro Forma $-136.4M (+$72.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.37B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-208.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$72.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-136.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$52.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$72.2M
Modeled Uplift
$48.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $48.8M (vs $72.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$27.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$27.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$878K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$72.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$27.5M$27.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$26.4M$755K$27.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.2M$12.5M$16.7M$52.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$878K$878K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.9M$13.7M$20.6M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.6M$11.1M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$439K$878K$878K$878K$878K$878K$878K
Cumulative$0$19.7M$39.3M$58.6M$72.2M$72.2M$72.2M$72.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $72.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-208.6M$-208.6M-15.2%
Year 1$-214.9M+$48.1M$-166.7M-12.1%
Year 2$-221.3M+$72.2M$-149.1M-10.9%
Year 3$-228.0M+$72.2M$-155.8M-11.3%
Year 4$-234.8M+$72.2M$-162.6M-11.8%
Year 5$-241.9M+$72.2M$-169.6M-12.4%
$-2.09B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.87B
Exit EV (11x)
$220.2M
Value Created
$-169.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-332.3M
Organic Growth
$722.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-169.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.7M$20.6M$27.5M$32.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$32.6M
A/R Days Reduction$8.4M$12.5M$16.7M$20.0M
Clean Claim Rate$439K$659K$878K$1.1M
Total$36.1M$54.2M$72.2M$86.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.2%-15.1%-13.2%-11.0%
P21
Net-to-Gross28.3%26.5%28.7%35.5%
P43
Occupancy68.7%74.6%83.1%94.8%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.8M$2.2M$2.9M
P50
Exp/Bed$2.6M$2.0M$2.5M$3.2M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML