Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF BRISTOL 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF BRISTOL
CCN 493034 | VA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$622K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 493034

REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF BRISTOL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$11.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$622K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$451K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$622K
Modeled Uplift
$465K
Risk-Adjusted
-$157K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$235K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$234K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$143K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$622K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$235K$235K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$226K$8K$234K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$107K$143K$451K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$117K$176K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$117K$176K$234K$234K$234K$234K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$95K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$170K$340K$505K$622K$622K$622K$622K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $622K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M14.8%
Year 1$1.8M+$415K$2.2M18.8%
Year 2$1.9M+$622K$2.5M21.0%
Year 3$1.9M+$622K$2.5M21.5%
Year 4$2.0M+$622K$2.6M22.0%
Year 5$2.0M+$622K$2.6M22.5%
$17.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.6M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$6.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$117K$176K$235K$282K
Denial Rate Reductio$117K$176K$234K$281K
A/R Days Reduction$71K$107K$143K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$311K$466K$622K$746K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.8%-10.8%-0.7%12.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross62.0%26.3%31.6%46.8%
P85
Occupancy90.2%39.7%49.7%71.4%
P93
Rev/Bed$470K$528K$1.2M$2.0M
P15
Exp/Bed$400K$464K$1.4M$1.9M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML