Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 493033 | VA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $9.8M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$484K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$757K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$750K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$461K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$757K$757K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$729K$21K$750K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$345K$461K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$379K$568K$757K$757K$757K$757K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$375K$562K$750K$750K$750K$750K
A/R Days Reduction$0$154K$307K$461K$461K$461K$461K$461K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$542K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.6x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M20.6%
Year 1$8.0M+$1.3M$9.4M24.7%
Year 2$8.3M+$2.0M$10.3M27.1%
Year 3$8.5M+$2.0M$10.5M27.8%
Year 4$8.8M+$2.0M$10.8M28.5%
Year 5$9.1M+$2.0M$11.0M29.2%
$78.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$121.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.4M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$379K$568K$757K$909K
Denial Rate Reductio$375K$562K$750K$900K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$346K$461K$553K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$996K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.6%-9.5%5.9%15.1%
P93
Net-to-Gross81.8%21.1%26.7%32.4%
P98
Occupancy96.2%40.1%54.7%77.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$631K$396K$668K$1.7M
P43
Exp/Bed$501K$436K$752K$1.6M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML