Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 493032 | VA | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $7.4M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$431K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$641K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$635K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$390K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$641K$641K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$617K$18K$635K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$98K$292K$390K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$160K$321K$481K$641K$641K$641K$641K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$159K$318K$476K$635K$635K$635K$635K
A/R Days Reduction$0$130K$260K$390K$390K$390K$390K$390K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$459K$919K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M17.9%
Year 1$5.9M+$1.1M$7.0M22.0%
Year 2$6.1M+$1.7M$7.8M24.3%
Year 3$6.3M+$1.7M$8.0M24.9%
Year 4$6.5M+$1.7M$8.2M25.4%
Year 5$6.7M+$1.7M$8.4M26.0%
$57.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$91.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.4M
Value Created
$8.4M
Exit EBITDA
$9.2M
Organic Growth
$16.9M
RCM Value Creation
$8.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$321K$481K$641K$770K
Denial Rate Reductio$318K$476K$635K$762K
A/R Days Reduction$195K$293K$390K$468K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$21K$25K
Total$844K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.9%-9.5%5.9%15.1%
P83
Net-to-Gross73.2%21.1%26.7%32.4%
P91
Occupancy90.2%40.1%54.7%77.5%
P94
Rev/Bed$553K$396K$668K$1.7M
P37
Exp/Bed$454K$436K$752K$1.6M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML