Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL
CCN 493025 | VA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $4.4M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$816K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$817K
Risk-Adjusted
-$303K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$426K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$421K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$259K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$426K$426K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$410K$12K$421K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$65K$194K$259K$816K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$106K$213K$319K$426K$426K$426K$426K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$105K$211K$316K$421K$421K$421K$421K
A/R Days Reduction$0$86K$173K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$305K$610K$908K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M15.6%
Year 1$3.4M+$746K$4.2M19.6%
Year 2$3.5M+$1.1M$4.6M21.9%
Year 3$3.6M+$1.1M$4.8M22.4%
Year 4$3.7M+$1.1M$4.9M22.9%
Year 5$3.9M+$1.1M$5.0M23.4%
$33.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.5M
Value Created
$5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$5.3M
Organic Growth
$11.2M
RCM Value Creation
$5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$213K$319K$426K$511K
Denial Rate Reductio$211K$316K$421K$506K
A/R Days Reduction$129K$194K$259K$311K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$16K
Total$560K$840K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-11.8%4.8%14.5%
P79
Net-to-Gross47.2%23.0%30.4%44.4%
P79
Occupancy79.1%41.3%50.2%74.6%
P76
Rev/Bed$532K$493K$920K$2.0M
P29
Exp/Bed$449K$450K$1.1M$2.0M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML