Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 18:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 492010 | VA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-904K → Pro Forma $-354K (+$551K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-904K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$551K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-354K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$398K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$551K
Modeled Uplift
$391K
Risk-Adjusted
-$160K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$208K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$207K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$126K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$551K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$200K$8K$208K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$207K$207K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$94K$126K$398K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$208K$208K$208K$208K
Cost to Collect$0$52K$104K$155K$207K$207K$207K$207K
A/R Days Reduction$0$42K$84K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$151K$301K$447K$551K$551K$551K$551K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $551K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-904K$-904K-8.7%
Year 1$-932K+$367K$-564K-5.4%
Year 2$-960K+$551K$-409K-3.9%
Year 3$-988K+$551K$-438K-4.2%
Year 4$-1.0M+$551K$-467K-4.5%
Year 5$-1.0M+$551K$-498K-4.8%
$-9.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.6M
Value Created
$-498K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$5.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-498K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$104K$156K$208K$249K
Cost to Collect$104K$155K$207K$249K
A/R Days Reduction$63K$95K$126K$151K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$275K$413K$551K$661K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.7%-12.9%4.0%14.8%
P27
Net-to-Gross21.3%22.1%30.4%45.3%
P17
Occupancy64.2%40.3%50.6%75.3%
P61
Rev/Bed$288K$483K$800K$2.0M
P10
Exp/Bed$313K$449K$1.1M$2.0M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML