Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND LLC 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND LLC
CCN 492009 | VA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.6M → Pro Forma $-7.7M (+$853K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$853K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$622K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$853K
Modeled Uplift
$576K
Risk-Adjusted
-$276K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$324K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$321K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$197K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$853K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$324K$324K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$312K$9K$321K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$50K$148K$197K$622K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$81K$162K$243K$324K$324K$324K$324K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$80K$160K$241K$321K$321K$321K$321K
A/R Days Reduction$0$66K$132K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$232K$464K$691K$853K$853K$853K$853K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $853K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.6M$-8.6M-52.9%
Year 1$-8.8M+$569K$-8.3M-51.0%
Year 2$-9.1M+$853K$-8.2M-50.9%
Year 3$-9.4M+$853K$-8.5M-52.6%
Year 4$-9.7M+$853K$-8.8M-54.3%
Year 5$-9.9M+$853K$-9.1M-56.1%
$-85.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-100.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-14.2M
Value Created
$-9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.7M
Organic Growth
$8.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$162K$243K$324K$389K
Denial Rate Reductio$160K$241K$321K$385K
A/R Days Reduction$99K$148K$197K$237K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$426K$640K$853K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.5%5.9%15.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross16.9%21.1%26.7%32.4%
P13
Occupancy54.8%40.1%54.7%77.5%
P50
Rev/Bed$270K$396K$668K$1.7M
P15
Exp/Bed$413K$436K$752K$1.6M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML