Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BATH COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 06:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BATH COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 491300 | VA | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.4M → Pro Forma $-6.5M (+$915K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 491300

BATH COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$17.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$915K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$667K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$915K
Modeled Uplift
$589K
Risk-Adjusted
-$326K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$348K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$344K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$212K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$915K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$348K$348K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$335K$10K$344K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$158K$212K$667K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$87K$174K$261K$348K$348K$348K$348K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$86K$172K$258K$344K$344K$344K$344K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$141K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$249K$498K$742K$915K$915K$915K$915K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $915K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.4M$-7.4M-42.4%
Year 1$-7.6M+$610K$-7.0M-40.2%
Year 2$-7.8M+$915K$-6.9M-39.7%
Year 3$-8.1M+$915K$-7.1M-41.1%
Year 4$-8.3M+$915K$-7.4M-42.5%
Year 5$-8.6M+$915K$-7.6M-43.9%
$-73.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-84.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-10.2M
Value Created
$-7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.8M
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$174K$261K$348K$417K
Denial Rate Reductio$172K$258K$344K$413K
A/R Days Reduction$106K$159K$212K$254K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$458K$686K$915K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-42.4%-17.6%-1.4%9.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross62.1%26.8%39.3%49.8%
P92
Occupancy28.7%36.6%49.1%68.2%
P17
Rev/Bed$1.2M$753K$1.5M$2.3M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.8M$755K$1.7M$2.4M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML