Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE DOCTORS HOSPITAL WILLIAMSB 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE DOCTORS HOSPITAL WILLIAMSB
CCN 490143 | VA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $11.8M → Pro Forma $15.7M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$74.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$901K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$227K$674K$901K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$370K$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$366K$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$300K$601K$901K$901K$901K$901K$901K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
10.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.8M$11.8M15.9%
Year 1$12.1M+$2.6M$14.7M19.9%
Year 2$12.5M+$3.9M$16.4M22.2%
Year 3$12.9M+$3.9M$16.8M22.7%
Year 4$13.3M+$3.9M$17.2M23.2%
Year 5$13.7M+$3.9M$17.6M23.7%
$117.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$193.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$75.3M
Value Created
$17.6M
Exit EBITDA
$18.8M
Organic Growth
$38.9M
RCM Value Creation
$17.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$450K$676K$901K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$47K$57K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.9%-11.8%4.8%14.5%
P81
Net-to-Gross31.5%23.0%30.4%44.4%
P52
Occupancy47.3%41.3%50.2%74.6%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.9M$493K$920K$2.0M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.6M$450K$1.1M$2.0M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML