Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPOTSYLVANIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPOTSYLVANIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 490141 | VA | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $7.7M → Pro Forma $15.4M (+$7.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$146.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$7.7M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $7.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$94K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$80K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$449K$1.3M$1.8M$5.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$94K$94K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$731K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$724K$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$593K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$47K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.2M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.8x
9.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
10.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
11.0x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.7M$7.7M5.2%
Year 1$7.9M+$5.1M$13.0M8.9%
Year 2$8.1M+$7.7M$15.8M10.8%
Year 3$8.4M+$7.7M$16.1M11.0%
Year 4$8.6M+$7.7M$16.3M11.2%
Year 5$8.9M+$7.7M$16.6M11.3%
$76.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$182.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$105.7M
Value Created
$16.6M
Exit EBITDA
$12.2M
Organic Growth
$76.9M
RCM Value Creation
$16.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$889K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$47K$70K$94K$112K
Total$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.2%-7.4%5.7%17.2%
P47
Net-to-Gross18.2%20.4%26.4%32.4%
P19
Occupancy74.9%45.6%64.7%78.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.4M$426K$1.2M$1.9M
P51
Exp/Bed$1.3M$462K$1.1M$1.9M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML