Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 490136 | VA | 128 beds | Current EBITDA $29.3M → Pro Forma $47.2M (+$17.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$339.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$17.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.1M (vs $17.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$217K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.8M$6.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.5M$187K$6.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.1M$4.1M$13.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$217K$217K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$109K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Cumulative$0$4.9M$9.7M$14.5M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
11.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.3M$29.3M8.6%
Year 1$30.2M+$11.9M$42.1M12.4%
Year 2$31.1M+$17.9M$49.0M14.4%
Year 3$32.0M+$17.9M$49.9M14.7%
Year 4$33.0M+$17.9M$50.9M15.0%
Year 5$34.0M+$17.9M$51.8M15.3%
$293.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$570.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$277.2M
Value Created
$51.8M
Exit EBITDA
$46.7M
Organic Growth
$178.7M
RCM Value Creation
$51.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$8.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$109K$163K$217K$261K
Total$8.9M$13.4M$17.9M$21.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.6%-6.0%6.0%15.1%
P58
Net-to-Gross24.0%20.8%26.3%31.4%
P40
Occupancy100.6%46.8%64.8%78.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$2.7M$459K$1.6M$1.9M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.4M$560K$1.4M$1.8M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML