Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INOVA MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INOVA MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL
CCN 490122 | VA | 140 beds | Current EBITDA $46.5M → Pro Forma $60.3M (+$13.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$263.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$46.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$60.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$13.8M
Modeled Uplift
$9.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.2M (vs $13.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$168K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.3M$5.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.1M$145K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$808K$2.4M$3.2M$10.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$168K$168K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$84K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x56% / 9.4x
10.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$46.5M$46.5M17.7%
Year 1$47.9M+$9.2M$57.1M21.7%
Year 2$49.3M+$13.8M$63.2M24.0%
Year 3$50.8M+$13.8M$64.6M24.6%
Year 4$52.3M+$13.8M$66.2M25.1%
Year 5$53.9M+$13.8M$67.7M25.7%
$464.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$745.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$280.2M
Value Created
$67.7M
Exit EBITDA
$74.0M
Organic Growth
$138.5M
RCM Value Creation
$67.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$84K$126K$168K$202K
Total$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$16.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.7%-5.7%6.0%14.9%
P83
Net-to-Gross41.0%20.5%25.6%30.2%
P89
Occupancy43.2%46.9%66.6%79.5%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.9M$532K$1.6M$1.9M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.5M$602K$1.4M$1.8M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML