Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHESAPEAKE GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHESAPEAKE GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 490120 | VA | 302 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $24.6M (+$20.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$398.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$20.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.8M (vs $20.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$255K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.0M$8.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.7M$219K$7.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$255K$255K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$17.0M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x116% / 46.6x121% / 52.2x125% / 57.7x127% / 60.5x129% / 63.3x
9.0x110% / 41.1x115% / 46.0x120% / 51.0x122% / 53.4x124% / 55.9x
10.0x106% / 36.7x110% / 41.1x115% / 45.5x117% / 47.8x119% / 50.0x
11.0x101% / 33.0x106% / 37.1x110% / 41.1x112% / 43.1x114% / 45.1x
12.0x97% / 30.0x102% / 33.7x106% / 37.4x108% / 39.2x110% / 41.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M0.9%
Year 1$3.8M+$14.0M$17.8M4.5%
Year 2$3.9M+$20.9M$24.9M6.2%
Year 3$4.0M+$20.9M$25.0M6.3%
Year 4$4.2M+$20.9M$25.1M6.3%
Year 5$4.3M+$20.9M$25.2M6.3%
$37.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$277.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$240.6M
Value Created
$25.2M
Exit EBITDA
$5.9M
Organic Growth
$209.4M
RCM Value Creation
$25.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$191K$255K$306K
Total$10.5M$15.7M$20.9M$25.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%0.7%6.0%14.7%
P28
Net-to-Gross31.4%24.2%27.9%35.2%
P56
Occupancy74.9%62.1%73.9%81.7%
P62
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.5M$1.8M$2.1M
P16
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML