Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA PRINCESS ANNE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA PRINCESS ANNE HOSPITAL
CCN 490119 | VA | 174 beds | Current EBITDA $37.3M → Pro Forma $56.3M (+$19.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$361.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$56.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$19.0M
Modeled Uplift
$14.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.5M (vs $19.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$231K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.2M$7.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.0M$199K$7.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$231K$231K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$116K$231K$231K$231K$231K$231K$231K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.4M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.3M$37.3M10.3%
Year 1$38.4M+$12.7M$51.1M14.1%
Year 2$39.6M+$19.0M$58.6M16.2%
Year 3$40.8M+$19.0M$59.8M16.5%
Year 4$42.0M+$19.0M$61.0M16.9%
Year 5$43.3M+$19.0M$62.3M17.2%
$373.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$685.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$311.9M
Value Created
$62.3M
Exit EBITDA
$59.4M
Organic Growth
$190.2M
RCM Value Creation
$62.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$116K$173K$231K$278K
Total$9.5M$14.3M$19.0M$22.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.3%-4.0%5.6%15.1%
P62
Net-to-Gross27.9%20.6%25.9%31.4%
P62
Occupancy92.2%52.2%68.4%79.0%
P94
Rev/Bed$2.1M$657K$1.6M$1.9M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.9M$679K$1.4M$1.8M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML